Archive for the ‘dream history’ Category

A Century of Dreaming with Freud

Tuesday, August 10th, 2010

by Richard Wilkerson

freudThe year 2000 marked the 100th anniversary of Freud’s work, The Interpretation of Dreams, and a century of debate that has produced insights and conflict in science, the humanities, the arts, and social and religious organizations. To talk about whether we like or don’t like Freud’s ideas on dreaming is now akin to discussing whether we like or dislike government.

Freud said that The Interpretation of Dreams was his favorite and most insightful book. He was very disappointed that the psychoanalytic movement did not advance the ideas set out in it and all but abandoned dreams to focus on something called transference. Transference is the transfer of a patient’s feelings for his/her parents to the therapist. This and other approaches quickly took over as a main focus of psychoanalysis. Dreams continued to be listened to, but fell away from what Freud called “The Royal road to the unconscious.”

Dreams as the Disguised Fulfillment of a Repressed Wish
As children we are taught to repress various thoughts, impulses, and actions. Eventually an inner censor takes over, and we begin to keep these things repressed without the help of mommy and daddy. During sleep we relax and these repressed feelings emerge. If they were to emerge fully, they would wake us up and disturb our sleep. So the censor hands them over to what Freud calls the dream-work. As dreams are the guardians of sleep, the repressed wish is cleverly disguised.

(more…)

Dreams and Surrealism

Tuesday, July 27th, 2010

Richard Wilkerson

surrealism"Whoever wants to be creative in good and evil, he must first be an annihilator and destroy values." Friedreich Nietzsche

For many of us, when Surrealism is mentioned, the image that generally come to mind is the liquid melting clocks of Salvador Dali. But In Europe, Surrealism was also a social, political, and poetic human liberation movement that championed the dream.

Like the Romantics before them, the Surrealists saw that the reasonable and rational held out a limited view for mankind, and that rationality, reality and religion had so choked our options for experience that all the marvels and significance of being were missed. Andre Breton, the father of Surrealism within the Modernist movement, drew together this Romantic spirit with the new leftist politics and the discoveries of psychoanalysis. "(Reality) revolves in a cage ."(Breton as quoted by Kelly, 1994)

The solution was the development of practices that challenged the old order and offered the new in the cast out forms of madness, social anarchy, disobedience, the shocking and the absurd. However, this anarchy was never anything more than a temporary technique for merging the social and the aesthetic, the dayworld and the nightworld; the sane with the insane. Waking and dreaming reality were to come together in Surreality. In Surreality, the role of dreams was to usher in the astonishing and open up to new possibilities. As Breton once said considering the amount of time we spend in dreams and waking life, "there is disproportionate attention to waking life." (Kelly, pg 37) The dream is seen as offering–a challenge in ushering in the marvelous. The search was to be a synthesis of dream and waking in Surreality, neither a compliance to conventional reality nor aretreatinto dreamland.

Sadly, Surrealism itself went the way of many Modernist movements; it became formalized and choked–in its own institutions. Breton’s contacts with Freud were not particularly productive and Breton’s analysis of his own dreams fail to bring to bear the wonderful spirit of reality offered in other realms. But the spirit of the movement has endured and has widely influenced not only postmodern philosophy and practice in Europe but offered itself as a kindred spirit ofthe human potential movements in the Americas in the 1960’s that also began to see the reality being served by the mainstream culture as limiting, repressive and dangerous.

How then can we approach the dream so as to liberate the marvelous on one hand without sinking into complete unreality on the other? Akhter Ahsen, a contemporary proponent of Surrealism, offers some modern perspectives andtechniques on dreams and imagery that may begin to give up a clue to theSurrealist Experiment.

From Ahsen in New Surrealism, The Liberation of Images In Consciousness: “One gets up in the morning and the eyes are still heavy with sleep. One opens up the eyes and the light comes in so strong that one dives back into sleep to avoid the traumatic impact o impassive reality."

The impassive reality can be so traumatic that the mind learns to withdraw from it. The passivity of an unmoving reality is anti-mind. When you look, the things stay there, nothing moves. But the mind wants to move. That is the contradiction. And if the mind has already been bombarded and constrained by replicas of immovable mental objects, dogmas and frozen belief systems, then where are the original movements of the mind manifested? Where is the original face of reality and its strength revealed?

Exercise: Let us see how some of Ahsen’s imagery exercises might be applied to dreams to bring us back into contact with surreality.

A. Look at something static in your room, a bookcase or door. Watch it for about a half a minute .. and return your attention to it if you drift. Note the dullness and" umovingness of this outer reality."

B. Now pick a dream.

1. Pick an image in a dream and : hold it in your mind. If you begin to wander, bring the image backagain and again for about a half a minute.

2. Locate the part of the image that pleases you the most and repeatedly bring this part of the image back into your mind.

3. Note the place of the image within your awareness, and how the image seems to be inside the mind.

4. Compare the image to the outerimage you had. Which is more pleasurable? The outside boring world or the new freshness of the inner image?

5. Which part of the dream image gives you a feeling of beauty?Explore for a moment the beautiful aspects of the image.

6. Which part ofthe image gives you a feeling of power? What is the source of this power and how does the dream image reflect this power? How might it be developed?

7. Now hold this dream image again in your mind a few seconds and then look at the outside world. Has the outside world now brightened up as a result? Note how attention on the inner imagination can make the outer world look more interesting

8. Experiment with bringing into your dream image various people in your waking life. Note how bringing them into the image, looking at them in detail and then viewing them again in the outer world changes the way we view
them.

Though Ahsen seems to miss the point that we are in the imagination as much as the imagination is in us, his delightful array of imagery techniques (this being but one of hundreds he offers) still work to bring out the idea that we can valorize dreamland imagery without getting lost it in, and that there is a place ofexchange between the waking and dreaming world that offers us tremendous sources o creativity and new possibilities in the creation of our own
Surreality.

Originally published in The Dream Tree News, Volume 2-1. © Richard Wilkerson.

Richard Wilkerson, Cyber-Pioneer and Dream Visionary, is an editor of Electric Dreams, an online magazine and dream sharing community, and the creative genius behind numerous
educational and interactive projects on the Internet, including DreamGate, Online Dream History Classes, Dream Art Galleries and much, much more.
Visit him online at DreamGate

Gestalt Dream Techniques, Part II

Tuesday, April 20th, 2010

by Richard Wilkerson

There is notion in Gestalt work that by taking on these roles, we begin to integrate them into a gestalt or whole personality. In a sense this makes the dream out to be a deception and we dream because we can’t directly admit to being these parts, i.e. we have disowned them. But in another sense the dream is the carrier of our fate and future growth, and by re-owning these parts, we re-own a more complete personality.

Exercise: Take an image in the dream and walk around the room acting like this image. You might play a character as complex as a friend or relative, but also try playing the inanimate objects, like a stick, a rock or a watery bay.

But what about parts of the dream that still don’t seem to fit, even after becoming that part of the dream? For this is there is an additional exercise of having the parts talk and interact with one another. This is the famous procedure of using an empty chair and talking to one part of the dream image, pretending it is sitting in the chair, and then taking on the role of that image and speaking back.

(more…)

Gestalt Dream Techniques, Part I

Tuesday, April 13th, 2010

by: Richard Wilkerson

The founder of the Gestalt Therapy movement, Frederick (Fritz) Perls, took his initial training as a Freudian psychoanalyst, but soon saw psychoanalysis as a big game that kept the patient in the therapist’s pocket (or the therapist in the patient’s pockets) and began to work out quick, powerful techniques to return the control of one’s life back to the individual. His own group work would eventually become the model for many peer dream groups that would form in 1960’s and 1970’s.

The basic concept of Gestalt Perls believed that unresolved conflicts from the past had a great deal of influence upon present behavior, and that these conflicts needed to be "worked through" (Perls, 1969). He also felt that dreams were highly symbolic and made extensive use of interpretation. Perls felt all pas conflicts were continually acted out in the present, and chose to work on them in the here-and-now. In the here-and-now we are completely free and can choose responsibility and openness instead of illness. In the here-and-now we are free to actively control our own "becoming." Thus Perls would have his patients enact in the present the conflict and have them take on the various parts of the conflict as dramatic roles so the patient could become aware of the conflict, contact it and control the direction of it in the present and future. Thus one’s feelings and actions become unified in a whole, what Perls calls a gestalt, that is more spontaneous, open and honest.

(more…)

Alfred Adler & Dream Styles

Thursday, February 11th, 2010

by Richard Wilkerson

If we can characterize desire in Freud as erotically oriented, and desire in Jung as wholeness oriented, then we can say in Adler that desire is oriented to overcoming early feelings of inferiority. These feelings stem from the beginning of life, dependent and small, and evolve as we find ways ofovercoming these feelings of inferiority and becoming productive. This strivings follow us rightinto the night; ”Now just as our waking life, we have seen, is determined by the goal of superiority, so wemay see that dreams are determined by the individual goal ofsuperiority." (Adler, 1929, p.155)

For Adler, the dream tries to help us overcome the same feelings of inferiority we feel in our life, but without the restraint of concrete reality. Thus the dream is not only a experimental laboratory to safely try out new possibilities, but also a window on the style we use in general.

To interpret the dream is to interpret the style of the dreamer.

(more…)

Carl Gustav Jung: Using Dreams to Find Our Myths

Tuesday, February 2nd, 2010

by Richard Wilkerson

Carl Jung was both a colleague and student of Freud, yet their views and ideas differed. Freud thought dreaming as a means to cleverly allow the sleeping mind to disharge repressed and disturbing desires by disguising them. Jung acknowledged this level of dreaming, but felt that the unconscious was much more vast andthat dreams were an unconscious attempt to bring about our most wonderful potentials as human beings. We could actively participate in this process by seeing what the dream was revealing rather than disguising. What was the dream revealing? Our path to wholeness as unique individuals – something Jung called Individuation, which simply means that because each individual becomes who they most essentially are,themselves, the path is unique and different for each person. Each dream presents a unique set of circumstances, so that the application of any theory we have acquired in the past violates its uniqueness in the same way thattreating new people we meet (or old ones for that matter) like they should be someone else or something else we have previously decided upon would violate the essence of who they really are.

(more…)

Dreams and Religion

Sunday, January 17th, 2010

By Richard Catlett Wilkerson

It seems likely that dreams and spirituality have gone hand in hand since the beginning of time. Sometimes it included hand-to hand combat, and sometimes it included hands reaching out to create and support one another. Looking at the history of dream sharing in Abrahamic Religions (Judaism, Christianity, and Islam),it is apparent that dreams can be used to support spirituality, but can also threaten orthodox structures. Hopefully we can gain from this historic investigation a sense of the work that needs to be done to bring dream sharing back into religious communities as a powerful and significant spiritual path.

Although every major religion began with dream sharing, the practice was eventually banned or restricted to a small group at the top of the hierarchy. Mohammed, for example, banned dream interpretation but asked his followers to tell him their dreams. In Christianity, only saints were allowed to interpret dreams. Esoterics sporadically revived and experimmented with dream sharing, but at their own risk and peril. It was notuncommon for women to be burnt as witches during the Spanish Inquisition for dream sharing. This story repeats itself in all the axis religions East and West.

(more…)

From Ancient Thrace to Cyberspace: Moments in Dream History

Tuesday, January 5th, 2010

by
Richard Catlett Wilkerson

The Greek Dream Bridge
It may seem strange to start a column on the history of dreams with such a late culture as the Classic Greeks. Ater all, texts were first written in cuneiform by the Sumarians and among those texts are records of dreams. Anthropological evidence suggests dream sharing must be as ancient as language itself. Yet I feel the Classic Greeks (let’s stretch it and say 600-150 BeE) to be a marker culture, specifying a time (at least metaphorically) when our loyalties began to divide between rational and irrational.

(more…)

Freud on Dream Interpretation

Saturday, November 21st, 2009

Freud on Dream Interpretation http://bit.ly/3KlyT0